In the court of public discussion to find the truth, how can the public court decide what is truth, if they are not allowed to hear all sides of the scientific story? Wont the truth shine like a beacon from among the falsehood, if it is all laid before the court? Does the public court not demand to hear all the evidence?
The Omaha Guide, October 13, 1945
“Without freedom of thought, there can be no such thing as wisdom; and no such thing as public liberty, without freedom of speech.” - Benjamin Franklin
https://humblymybrain.substack.com/p/free-speech-is-the-life-blood-of
On April 30, 1903, The Daily Pioneer published an article titled, “Great Pugilist As A Reformer: John L. Sullivan Gives Advice on Many Important Issues.”1 John Lawrence Sullivan was an American professional boxer from Roxbury, Massachusetts.
